Down A Slippery Slope: Regulating Executive Compensation Sets a Bad Precedent

Our government has proven once again that it is more reactive than proactive. Government proposals to place a $500,000 limit on executive compensation for Wall Street bankers is purely a political reaction to the public outrage over the profitability of investment banks in a time of economic crisis. The extravagant bonuses and profits that are earned on Wall Street are the norm and have been so for decades. Investment bankers and money managers command extraordinary salaries, multimillion dollar bonuses, and stock options for managing huge amounts of risk for their firms and investors. The politicians in Washington are very familiar with how this game works and they receive political contributions from these same firms and their executives on a regular basis. To the extent that taxpayer dollars were used to protect the solvency of financial institutions, it is completely reasonable to cap executive compensation. However, it is equally hypocritical for politicians to chide investment bankers for reaping enormous profits during the current economic downturn while they failed to admonish them for even greater earnings and bonuses when the economy was booming. Industry regulators and politicians in Washington didn’t say or do anything for years to address the increasingly risky activities of these firms and the explosion of hedging instruments and strategies. Somehow everyone wants to believe that multimillion dollar salaries and bonuses are the root cause of America’s financial crisis. Contrary to popular belief, greed, ego, and corruption are at the root of our current economic crisis and these human tendencies are not characteristic of the financial industry alone. Legislating executive compensation will not resolve these human temptations and weaknesses that have become so pervasive in our culture.


The irony surrounding the proposed executive compensation restrictions for the financial industry is that the government does not place any limits on the compensation of executives who work in industries that have received government subsidies and tax and trade incentives for decades. The level of hypocrisy being exhibited by the government and the double standards being applied across industries and sectors are too obvious. One can only wonder how the government is able to justify capping executive compensation for one industry and not for others, especially since they all benefit from some form of government assistance or tax breaks. Meddling with executive compensation sets a bad precedent for any governmental entity. Boards of Directors, shareholders, and consumers are the only stakeholders who should be establishing compensation guidelines for corporate executives. After all, that’s what Board votes, shareholder meetings, and consumer protests and boycotts are for. Government interference in free market practices not only sets a bad precedent, but it will ultimately encourage companies to relocate overseas to corporate friendly cities such as London, which has been clamoring to become the center of global financial activity. To the extent that corporate failures do not threaten a collapse of the entire American economy, we must be courageous enough to allow companies to fail when they make bad decisions and engage in highly risky activities. Similarly, if companies don’t want the government interfering with their proprietary practices, then they should reject government bailouts during times of crisis.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.