The Language and Politics of School Vouchers
As student academic achievement continues to improve at a snail's pace, families and communities are showing a greater propensity toward educational choices that were considered anathema just a decade ago. We can all recall the outrage from educational elites and others as school vouchers became more visible and began to gain momentum. These new student scholarships were described by the opposition as taking public dollars and giving them to the private sector. These same opponents, however, were not at all eager to acknowledge that they (and those they wanted to protect) were failing miserably at educating our young people. Proponents of vouchers genuinely sought to grant less fortunate youth with access to better educational opportunities, while also hoping to force school systems to innovate. These scholarship programs were indeed good faith attempts at school reform, but too often many of them were flawed and fell short of providing the full range of academic support a child might need if awarded a voucher. Although many of these early voucher experiments were truly imperfect, they represented game changers and forced most of us to check ourselves and ask why not consider a new approach, especially considering the incredibly poor performance of far too many students. The tired rhetoric, political posturing, and misrepresentations of people's agendas drowned out the voices of reason and openness for many years. Current scholarship opportunities reflect the enhancements and additional funding needed to make them more promising and attractive to parents seeking functional learning environments.
Thankfully, students' academic needs have moved to the center of the debate and parents' choices and decisions are not being tainted by the poisonous political and divisive climates of past years. The alarmingly low test scores, the knowledge and information explosion globally, and all the other stark realities about



Comments